COMMENT | Everest’s status as a breed-shaper undiminished by lack of Group 1 status
Three contenders in Saturday's The Everest can follow Yes Yes Yes' steps and frank their future stallion values with a win in Australia’s richest race.
When Rubick colt Yes Yes Yes won the third edition of The Everest in 2019, there was understandable conjecture whether the lack of Group status afforded to the race would impact his appeal as a future stallion.
He proved the perfect test case for The Everest’s value in this regard, given he didn’t race again after his Randwick success, and only had a G2 Todman Stakes on his resume as an official stakes win.
In the high-stakes world of bloodstock, people look well beyond the black-type when selecting a stallion. With a wealth of data and analysis now at their disposal, breeders make their calls on who a horse may have beaten, in what times and in what circumstances, more so than they do according to race record alone.
On that day at Randwick, Yes Yes Yes ran a track record for the 1200 metres with Group 1 winners Santa Ana Lane and Trekking filling the placings. Further back were future winners of The Everest Classique Legend and Nature Strip, and indeed, the winner of the first two editions of the race, Redzel. That 2019 Everest was easily the strongest to date and it didn’t need Group 1 status to know what Yes Yes Yes had achieved.
So when Yes Yes Yes retired to Coolmore Stud the next year, breeders did not hesitate to support him. He stood, and still stands, at $38,500, a fee commensurate with a one-time Group 1 winner of his pedigree and profile, and attracted 205 mares in his first year, the most of any first-season stallion that year.
He backed up with a book of 175 mares in his second season, making it clear that the lack of a Group 1 on his resume mattered nothing to those who believe that his race performance in The Everest warrants him to be considered among the most desired stallions in the land.